<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Leshaw Law &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leshawlaw.com/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leshawlaw.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 20:46:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>9-28-2013 &#8211; HOW TO TANK A MEDIATION WITHOUT EVEN TRYING</title>
		<link>http://leshawlaw.com/2013/08/9-28-2013-tank-mediation/</link>
		<comments>http://leshawlaw.com/2013/08/9-28-2013-tank-mediation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Leshaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leshawlaw.com/?p=846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HOW TO TANK A MEDIATION WITHOUT EVEN TRYING Every so often, you may want to tank a mediation. Maybe you know in advance it can’t settle. Maybe the blood is so bad between lawyers or clients that you just want to teach a lesson to the other side. It could be that you think the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://leshawlaw.com/2013/08/9-28-2013-tank-mediation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5-14-13 &#8211; Supreme Court Defines “Defalcation While Acting In A Fiduciary Capacity”</title>
		<link>http://leshawlaw.com/2013/05/5-14-13-supreme-court-defines-defalcation-acting-fiduciary-capacity/</link>
		<comments>http://leshawlaw.com/2013/05/5-14-13-supreme-court-defines-defalcation-acting-fiduciary-capacity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 16:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Leshaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leshawlaw.com/?p=787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United States Supreme Court yesterday issued a unanimous opinion clarifying that the term “defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity” “includes a culpable state of mind requirement . . . . We describe that state of mind as one involving knowledge of, or gross recklessness in respect to, the improper nature of the relevant [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://leshawlaw.com/2013/05/5-14-13-supreme-court-defines-defalcation-acting-fiduciary-capacity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5-13-13 &#8211; Eleventh Circuit Holds That Subchapter S Election Constitutes Reasonably Equivalent Value For Corporate Debtor’s Obligation To Pay Dividend</title>
		<link>http://leshawlaw.com/2013/05/5-13-eleventh-circuit-holds-subchapter-election/</link>
		<comments>http://leshawlaw.com/2013/05/5-13-eleventh-circuit-holds-subchapter-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 02:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Leshaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leshawlaw.com/?p=772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a case addressing an issue of apparent first impression, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held last week that a corporation’s subchapter S election constituted reasonably equivalent value for its obligation to pay a dividend, thus requiring dismissal of a suit to avoid the payment of a dividend as a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://leshawlaw.com/2013/05/5-13-eleventh-circuit-holds-subchapter-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
